INDEPENDENT2026

The Full Read · Article by Article

Matthew William Brann

Middle District of Pennsylvania · appt. Obama
7/7
🥇 Fit for the Bench
1Ethics & Recusalcritical
72%★ earned
“No man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause.” — Madison, Federalist No. 10
No disclosure, gift, or recusal issues in the public record; standard ethical profile.
60
2Fidelity to Democracycritical
80%★ earned
“…a government of laws, and not of men.” — Marshall, Marbury v. Madison
In 2020 dismissed the Trump campaign's Pennsylvania suit, declining to disenfranchise millions of voters (Washington Post).
60
3Judicial Temperament
73%★ earned
“Justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.” — Frankfurter
No documented temperament complaints; his 2020 opinion was pointed but within judicial norms.
60
4Reason, Not Ideology
74%★ earned
“We are not final because we are infallible…” — Robert H. Jackson
A federalist-society-affiliated Obama appointee whose 2020 ruling followed law over political pressure.
60
5Intellectual Honesty & Precedent
74%★ earned
“…to stand by things decided.” (stare decisis) — the common-law maxim
2020 election opinion cited law and record faithfully; no documented dishonesty.
60
6Independence from Party
74%★ earned
“The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential.” — Hamilton, Federalist No. 78
Ruled against the president of his own appointing-era politics on the merits, showing independence.
60
7Personal Integrity
75%★ earned
“The time is always right to do what is right.” — Martin Luther King Jr.
No criminal, civil, or corruption matters documented; integrity record appears clean.
60
Challenge this review

This review is offered freely and openly to correction. A challenge is considered only when it states a specific reason and links to sources that substantiate it — an assertion without evidence is not reviewed.

Are you Matthew William Brann? An official named in a review may answer it by phone rather than in writing. Confirm it's you and we'll arrange a call.

Scores are Independent 2026’s own editorial read against the Seven Articles — ≥60% earns the star. The first two Articles are critical: fail Ethics & Recusal or Fidelity to Democracy and there is no seal, whatever else holds. Each Article carries its founding quote as the yardstick. On bias →

← All reviews