INDEPENDENT2026

The Full Read · Article by Article

Neomi Jehangir Rao

District of Columbia Circuit · appt. Trump
7/7
🥇 Fit for the Bench
1Ethics & Recusalcritical
70%★ earned
“No man is allowed to be a judge in his own cause.” — Madison, Federalist No. 10
Op-ed criticism (Washington Examiner) urged recusal from a Trump tax-return case; she followed circuit case-by-case practice, no upheld violation.
60
2Fidelity to Democracycritical
73%★ earned
“…a government of laws, and not of men.” — Marshall, Marbury v. Madison
No documented defiance of higher courts or election subversion; respects the constitutional order despite contested rulings.
60
3Judicial Temperament
72%★ earned
“Justice must satisfy the appearance of justice.” — Frankfurter
No documented reprimands or complaints alleging incivility toward litigants, counsel, or colleagues.
60
4Reason, Not Ideology
71%★ earned
“We are not final because we are infallible…” — Robert H. Jackson
Writes detailed doctrinal opinions; ideological critiques of her rulings fall outside conduct and are not counted here.
60
5Intellectual Honesty & Precedent
71%★ earned
“…to stand by things decided.” (stare decisis) — the common-law maxim
No documented departure from confirmation testimony; disputes over her opinions concern substance, not candor.
60
6Independence from Party
66%★ earned
“The complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential.” — Hamilton, Federalist No. 78
Critics note frequent alignment with the administration that appointed her, but rulings themselves are not scored; neutral-low.
60
7Personal Integrity
75%★ earned
“The time is always right to do what is right.” — Martin Luther King Jr.
No documented criminal, civil, or financial scandal; personal conduct record is clean.
60
Challenge this review

This review is offered freely and openly to correction. A challenge is considered only when it states a specific reason and links to sources that substantiate it — an assertion without evidence is not reviewed.

Are you Neomi Jehangir Rao? An official named in a review may answer it by phone rather than in writing. Confirm it's you and we'll arrange a call.

Scores are Independent 2026’s own editorial read against the Seven Articles — ≥60% earns the star. The first two Articles are critical: fail Ethics & Recusal or Fidelity to Democracy and there is no seal, whatever else holds. Each Article carries its founding quote as the yardstick. On bias →

← All reviews